Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Southern Shores refuses to publish the attached Variance documents on their website where all other documents are published. And, the Planning Board has yet to hold their hearing to sign the Order denying the Variance which was held after Andy Ward refused to recuse his self for bias which was proven by Andy Ward making a sign complaint against the Applicant's real estate sign, but not the "Oh So Sandy" sign which is significantly larger, as shown on the right and in the "New Leaders Needed" section. Andy Ward deceived all the Planning Board members voting on his removal from the hearing by claiming he did not complain about the "Oh So Sandy" sign because the Applicant's sign was "big" when the Applicant's sign was significantly smaller. The denied September 2, 2026 Variance will obviously be Appealed to the Dare County Superior Court with a Writ of Certiorari, but the question remains, why is the town spending money on attorneys to defend liars? Attorneys are prohibited from aiding and abetting fraud yet Southern Shores has spent more than $80,000 opposing the 75 E Dogwood Trail lot subdivision using a lot width amendment that was hidden from the Variance Applicant by Wes Haskett.
.jpeg/:/)
Cliff Ogburn refused to file a zoning text amendment that would allow property owners to seek disciplinary action against town employees for violating Town Code as property owners are subjected to disciplinary action for violating Town Code. This Zoning Text Amendment was submitted with the Variance Application being heard on September 2, 2026 because the Board of Adjustments must grant the Motion to Preclude Variance hearing and Approve Variance if there is competent, relevant evidence of neglect, unlawful acts, conspiracy and intentional misconduct on the part of the town. Refusing to allow property owners to submit a Zoning Text Amendment with the applicable filing fee is prohibited by North Carolina Obstruction of Justice Laws.
Read Wes Haskett's staff report here making false claims that "The applicant makes false allegations that Town Staff illegally adopted zoning requirements and was helping a real estate scam which are not related to the property's size, location, or topography." Find Applicant's responses next...
Find proof here that Wes Haskett claimed "Town Staff was submitting another text amendment in the near future that may allow pie shaped or other irregularly shaped lots" on June 7, 2023 and other properties with more than 1 dwelling like Haskett does not want Applicant building. Applicant purchased the property to sub divide the lot with a pie shaped or irregularly shaped lot but Wes Haskett never filed the text amendment.
Find proof here that Wes Haskett claimed "Town Staff was submitting another text amendment in the near future that may allow pie shaped or other irregularly shaped lots" on June 7, 2023 and other properties with more than 1 dwelling like Haskett does not want Applicant building. Applicant purchased the property to sub divide the lot with a pie shaped or irregularly shaped lot but Wes Haskett never filed the text amendment. Wes Haskett claims the Variance is inconsistent with the spirit, purpose and intent of the lot width ordinance but Exhibit 1 proves Wes Haskett approved a lot plan at 233 N. Dogwood Trail without lot width requirements being met then would not give the Applicant the plan when a Public Records Request was filed.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.